You should not be lulled into a false sense of security by any given lawyer’s past results because every case is different and similar results may not be obtained in your case. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
- Nathaniel Pitoniak convinced a jury to return a verdict of Not Guilty on a serious felony with a punishment range of 25-99 years in prison. Following closing arguments, one of the prosecutors complimented him on his performance.
- He has convinced judges to offer deferred adjudication in cases where the state would offer his client only prison time. Deferred adjudication is a type of probation which affords an accused the opportunity to get the case removed from their record under certain circumstances.
- He has received pre-trial interventions for his clients, a type of deal under which a defendant does not have to plead guilty and the case is dismissed after a long reset. Such pre-trial interventions have 1) protected his clients’ immigration status, removing the possibility that they will be deported, and 2) protected his clients’ parole status, keeping them out of prison.
- Nathaniel Pitoniak has tried over thirty misdemeanor and felony jury trials. As an Assistant District Attorney for Harris County, he received extensive training and experience on how to effectively tell a story to a jury in a persuasive manner. His clients benefit from his talent, training, and reputation for persuasive advocacy.
- Nathaniel Pitoniak has obtained dismissals in felony and misdemeanor cases.
- He has received reductions in charges lower than the originally charged offense.
Notable Recent Case Results
STYLE
State of Texas v. ___________
ALLEGED OFFENSE
Continuous Sexual Abuse of a Child
PUNISHMENT RANGE
25-Life no parole
DISPOSITION
Charges Rejected Pre-Arrest
STYLE
State of Texas v. ___________
ALLEGED OFFENSE
Indecency with a Child by Contact
PUNISHMENT RANGE
25-Life (true habitual)
DISPOSITION
Not Guilty Verdict
STYLE
State of Texas v. ___________
ALLEGED OFFENSE
Injury to Child (Reckless)
PUNISHMENT RANGE
State Jail Felony
DISPOSITION
No-Billed By Grand Jury
STYLE
State of Texas v. ___________
ALLEGED OFFENSE
Injury to Elderly
PUNISHMENT RANGE
Third Degree Felony
DISPOSITION
Charges Rejected Pre-Arrest
STYLE
State of Texas v. ___________
ALLEGED OFFENSE
Assault - Family Member Second Offender
PUNISHMENT RANGE
Third Degree Felony
DISPOSITION
No-Billed By Grand Jury
STYLE
State of Texas v. ___________
ALLEGED OFFENSE
Money Laundering
PUNISHMENT RANGE
State Jail Felony
DISPOSITION
Dismissed